[Dosimetric comparison between the intensity modulated radiotherapy with fixed field and Rapid Arc of cervix cancer].
Fiche publication
Date publication
mai 2012
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr PEIFFERT Didier
Tous les auteurs :
Renard-Oldrini S, Brunaud C, Huger S, Marchesi V, Tournier-Rangeard L, Bouzid D, Harter V, Peiffert D
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
PURPOSE: Concurrent radiochemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. This treatment is responsible for bowel and hematologic toxicities. The use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), in static beams, allows a decrease of this toxicity. The technique of RapidArc((R)) IMRT could lower the dose delivered to the organs at risk and improve the homogeneity of the planning target volume coverage, while decreasing the processing time. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: For 20 patients, treatment plans performed with IMRT and RapidArc((R)) were compared. The target volumes were: the clinical target volume (gross tumour volume, uterus, upper third of the vagina, the hypogastric, iliac and presacral nodal regions), and the planning target volume (clinical target volume+1cm). The delineated organs at risk were: rectum, bladder, bowel and bone marrow. The dose was 45 Gy in 25 fractions. IMRT were delivered with five beams and RapidArc((R)) with two arcs. The comparisons were made by the non-parametric test of Wilcoxon. RESULTS: Medium coverage of the planning target volume was better with RapidArc((R)) (P=0.01). It was also better regarding the sparing of bowel (P=0.01) and IMRT was better regarding the sparing of bladder (P=0.01) and rectum (P=0.05). The total volume receiving 20 Gy was less important with RapidArc((R)) (P
Référence
Cancer Radiother. 2012 May;16(3):209-14