Impact of the prone position in an animal model of unilateral bacterial pneumonia undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Fiche publication
Date publication
mai 2013
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr LADOIRE Sylvain
Tous les auteurs :
Ladoire S, Pauchard LA, Barbar SD, Tissieres P, Croisier-Bertin D, Charles PE
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The prone position (PP) has proven beneficial in patients with severe lung injury subjected to mechanical ventilation (MV), especially in those with lobar involvement. We assessed the impact of PP on unilateral pneumonia in rabbits subjected to MV. METHODS: After endobronchial challenge with Enterobacter aerogenes, adult rabbits were subjected to either "adverse" (peak inspiratory pressure = 30 cm H2O, zero end-expiratory pressure; n = 10) or "protective" (tidal volume = 8 ml/kg, 5 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure; n = 10) MV and then randomly kept supine or turned to the PP. Pneumonia was assessed 8 h later. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Compared with the supine position, PP was associated with significantly lower bacterial concentrations within the infected lung, even if a "protective" MV was applied (5.93 [0.34] vs. 6.66 [0.86] log10 cfu/g, respectively; P = 0.008). Bacterial concentrations in the spleen were also decreased by the PP if the "adverse" MV was used (3.62 [1.74] vs. 6.55 [3.67] log10 cfu/g, respectively; P = 0.038). In addition, the noninfected lung was less severely injured in the PP group. Finally, lung and systemic inflammation as assessed through interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha measurement was attenuated by the PP. CONCLUSIONS: The PP could be protective if the host is subjected to MV and unilateral bacterial pneumonia. It improves lung injury even if it is utilized after lung injury has occurred and nonprotective ventilation has been administered.
Référence
Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1150-9