Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?
Fiche publication
Date publication
octobre 2023
Journal
World journal of urology
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Dr TRICARD Thibault
Tous les auteurs :
Cousin T, Peyronnet B, Bentellis I, Lasri S, Taha F, Hermieu N, Boileau A, Zelmar A, Ciolek C, Dubois A, Leon P, Hermieu JF, Brierre T, Gamé X, Tricard T, Saussine C, Lecoanet P, Vidart A, Bruyère F, Cornu JN, Monsaint H, Biardeau X, Capon G
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Persistence or recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (prSUI) after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation may be secondary to non-mechanical failure (NOMECA). It have for long been assumed to result from urethral atrophy. Its existence is now debated. As the pathophysiology of NOMECA is not elucidated, the most appropriate management remains unclear. We aimed to compare the several revision techniques for NOMECA of AUS in men.
Mots clés
Artificial urinary sphincter, Failure, Non-mechanical failure, Revision, Urethral atrophy, Urinary incontinence
Référence
World J Urol. 2023 10 30;: