Movement detection thresholds reveal proprioceptive impairments in developmental dyslexia.

Fiche publication


Date publication

janvier 2021

Journal

Scientific reports

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr PAPAXANTHIS Charalambos


Tous les auteurs :
Laprevotte J, Papaxanthis C, Saltarelli S, Quercia P, Gaveau J

Résumé

Developmental dyslexia is associated with vision and hearing impairments. Whether these impairments are causes or comorbidities is controversial. Because both senses are heavily involved in reading, cognitive theories argue that sensory impairments are comorbidities that result from a lack of reading practice. Sensory theories instead argue that this is sensory impairments that cause reading disabilities. Here we test a discriminant prediction: whether sensory impairments in developmental dyslexia are restrained to reading-related senses or encompass other senses. Sensory theories predict that all senses are affected, whereas, according to the lack of reading practice argument, cognitive theories predict that only reading-related senses are affected. Using a robotic ergometer and fully automatized analyses, we tested proprioceptive acuity in seventeen dyslexic children and seventeen age-matched controls on a movement detection task. Compared to controls, dyslexics had higher and more variable detection thresholds. For the weakest proprioceptive stimuli, dyslexics were twice as long and twice as variable as controls. More, proprioceptive acuity strongly correlated with reading abilities, as measured by blind cognitive evaluations. These results unravel a new sensory impairment that cannot be attributed to a lack of reading practice, providing clear support to sensory theories of developmental dyslexia. Protocol registration: This protocol is part of the following registration, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03364010; December 6, 2017.

Mots clés

Child, Dyslexia, physiopathology, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Proprioception, physiology, Reading

Référence

Sci Rep. 2021 01 11;11(1):299