External Validation of the SERC Trial Population: Comparison with the Multicenter French Cohort, the Swedish and SENOMIC Trial Populations for Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Node Micro-Metastasis.
Fiche publication
Date publication
octobre 2020
Journal
Cancers
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr MARCHAL Frédéric
Tous les auteurs :
Houvenaeghel G, El Hajj H, Barrou J, Cohen M, Raro P, De Troyer J, Gimbergues P, Tunon de Lara C, Ceccato V, Vaini-Cowen V, Faure-Virelizier C, Marchal F, Gauthier T, Jouve E, Theret P, Regis C, Desmons F, Tallet A, Boher JM,
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Many trials confirmed the safety of omitting axillary dissection in the selected patients treated for early breast cancer. The external validity of these trials is questionable. Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the French population representativity in the SERC trial and the differences between these two populations as well as comparing the French and the Swedish populations (the SENOMIC trial population and the Swedish National Breast Cancer Registry (NKBC) cohort) of patients with sentinel node (SN) micro-metastasis. A higher rate of smaller tumors and grade 1 tumors was observed in the French cohort when compared to the SERC population. Our findings conclude that both French populations show similar characteristics. Positive non-sentinel node (NSN) rates at completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were 10.28 % and 11.3 % in the SERC trial and French cohort, respectively ( = 0.5). The rate of grade 1 tumors was lower in the SENOMIC trial (16.2%) and in the NKBC cohort (17.4%) compared to the SERC trial population (27.3%) and the French cohort (34.4%). Our findings in addition to the previously demonstrated concordance between the SENOMIC trial and the NKBC populations imply that the results of both the SERC and the SENOMIC trials can be applied to both French and Swedish real populations.
Mots clés
breast cancer, micro-metastases, sentinel node, trial
Référence
Cancers (Basel). 2020 10 11;12(10):