Myocardial volume change during cardiac cycle derived from three orthogonal systolic strains: towards a quality assessment of strains.

Fiche publication


Date publication

janvier 2018

Journal

Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr FELBLINGER Jacques


Tous les auteurs :
Bonnemains L, Guerard AS, Soulié P, Odile F, Felblinger J

Résumé

Background The relative modification of the myocardial volume between end-systole and end-diastole ([Formula: see text]) has already been assessed with different methods and falls in a range of 0.9-0.97 (mean value = 0.93). Purpose To estimate [Formula: see text] from the three longitudinal ([Formula: see text], circumferential ([Formula: see text]), and radial ([Formula: see text]) strains of the left ventricle using the formula: [Formula: see text] and to test whether this estimate of [Formula: see text] can be used as a marker of the echocardiography quality. Material and Methods Two hundred manuscripts, including a total of 34,690 patients or healthy volunteers, were identified in the Medline database containing values of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] measured from echocardiography. Results The median value of was 0.93, in accordance with the literature, with no significant difference between patients or healthy volunteers ( P = 0.38). The proportion of studies with [Formula: see text] was 79%. When only considering groups of healthy volunteers, the studies failing this test had higher standard deviations for the three individual strains: 0.038 vs. 0.029 ( P = 0.02) for [Formula: see text]; 0.060 vs. 0.034 ( P < 10) for [Formula: see text], and 0.243 vs. 0.101 ( P < 10) for [Formula: see text]. Conclusion The median ratio of the left ventricular myocardial volumes between end-systole and end-diastole in the investigated studies was [Formula: see text]. The formula [Formula: see text] could be used to detect studies with inaccurate strain measurements.

Mots clés

Echocardiography, meta-analysis, myocardial contraction, stress mechanical

Référence

Acta Radiol. 2018 Jan 1;:284185118783777