Influence of pre-, intra- and post-operative parameters of donor liver on the outcome of isolated human hepatocytes.

Fiche publication


Date publication

janvier 2002

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr MANTION Georges, Pr MEYER Nicolas


Tous les auteurs :
Alexandre E, Cahn M, Abadie-Viollon C, Meyer N, Heyd B, Mantion G, Cinqualbre J, David P, Jaeck D, Richert L

Résumé

The aim of the present study was to analyse, retrospectively on a large panel of patients (149), the influence of the donor liver characteristics on the outcome of human hepatocyte isolation obtained from resected liver biopsies from surgical waste after hepatectomy. Among the pre-operative parameters, the type of disease, age and sex of the patient, previous chemotherapy, alcohol or tobacco consumption did not affect the yield, viability, attachment rate and function of the isolated human hepatocytes. Pre-operative biological and anatomopathological data indicated that, while mild steatosis (10% steatotic hepatocytes) tended to decrease hepatocyte yield. Cholestasis, as assessed by gamma-glutamyl transferase serum values, significantly negatively correlated with the percentage of digested liver and the yield of viable cells. Intra-operative clamping time, that is, warm ischaemia, longer than 30 min was found to decrease both the percentage of digested liver and cell yield. Among the post-operative parameters, the percentage of digested liver decreased when biopsy weights were higher than 100 g, the use of glue tended to increase both the percentage of digested tissue and the yield of viable cells.In conclusion, human diseased livers appear to be a valuable source of isolated functional human hepatocytes. We recommend, for an optimal isolation, to use liver biopsies weighing less than 100 g, to glue the section surfaces of the biopsies and to avoid the use of moderate steatotic livers (>10% steatotic hepatocytes) and cholestatic livers, as well as livers undergoing warm ischaemia or clamping during resection due to the decrease in cell yield.

Référence

Cell Tissue Bank. 2002;3(4):223-33.