Fiche publication
Date publication
mars 2025
Journal
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr MARESCAUX Jacques
,
Pr AKLADIOS Chérif
Tous les auteurs :
Pavone M, Goglia M, Rosati A, Innocenzi C, Bizzarri N, Seeliger B, Mascagni P, Ferrari FA, Forgione A, Testa AC, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Querleu D, Scambia G, Akladios C, Marescaux J, Lecointre L
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
Several new robotic platforms are being commercialised, with different features in terms of types of consoles, numbers of arms, and targeting transabdominal or natural orifice approaches. The benefits of robotic surgery over laparoscopy have yet to be conclusively demonstrated in gynaecology, as several studies comparing perioperative and postoperative patient outcomes have reported no significant differences, leading to a lack of precise recommendations in surgical guidelines for both gynaecologic oncology and benign gynaecology. In addition, these outcomes must be balanced against the high costs of robotic surgery, in particular when considering building an infrastructure for safe telesurgery to democratise access to telementoring and remote interventions.
Mots clés
Robotic-assisted surgery, artificial intelligence, image-guided surgery, minimally invasive surgery, telesurgery, training
Référence
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2025 03 28;17(1):50-60