[Plication of suburethral slings as treatment of persisting or recurring stress urinary incontinence].
Fiche publication
Date publication
décembre 2012
Auteurs
Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr DOUVIER Serge
Tous les auteurs :
Feyeux C, Mourtialon P, Guyomard A, Astruc K, Douvier S, Delorme E
Lien Pubmed
Résumé
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: Feasibility and efficiency study of mesh readjustment in suburethral slings by overcoat plication in case of persisting of recurring stress urinary incontinence in patients with suburethral slings. METHODS: Retrospective and monocentric study including patients that present with a failure or recurring incontinency after suburethral slings surgery. The eligibility was evaluated after a complete clinical and paraclinical statement, proving the recurrence of the incontinence and its mechanism. Surgery consisted in a plication in an overcoat. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. The medium delay between initial surgery and the plication was 23.4months (ds=25.5). Results were evaluated subjectively by the MHU questionnaire and objectively by the urodynamic appraisal. The medium survey was 27.2months (ds=37.3). The procedure lasts about 30minutes. According to MHU, 73.7% of patients were cured and for 10.3% the symptoms were lessened. The difference in the MHU score of stress urinary incontinence before and after mesh readjustment was significant (P=0.0005) and get down from 2.31 (ds=0.75) to 0.56 (ds=0.92) as an average. There was no complication during surgery. There were two cases of postoperative acute urinary retention which were reoperated by simply cutting a thread allowing the sling to relax without losing the benefit of the plicature. There was no significant increase in urge incontinence or dysuria. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirmed the feasibility, the efficiency and the low morbidity of mesh readjustment for the suburethral sling.
Référence
Prog Urol. 2012 Dec;22(16):1033-8