Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a decision-tree-based model.

Fiche publication


Date publication

février 2018

Journal

Journal of neuro-oncology

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr NOEL Georges


Tous les auteurs :
Audureau E, Chivet A, Ursu R, Corns R, Metellus P, Noel G, Zouaoui S, Guyotat J, Le Reste PJ, Faillot T, Litre F, Desse N, Petit A, Emery E, Lechapt-Zalcman E, Peltier J, Duntze J, Dezamis E, Voirin J, Menei P, Caire F, Dam Hieu P, Barat JL, Langlois O, Vignes JR, Fabbro-Peray P, Riondel A, Sorbets E, Zanello M, Roux A, Carpentier A, Bauchet L, Pallud J,

Résumé

We assessed prognostic factors in relation to OS from progression in recurrent glioblastomas. Retrospective multicentric study enrolling 407 (training set) and 370 (external validation set) adult patients with a recurrent supratentorial glioblastoma treated by surgical resection and standard combined chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment. Four complementary multivariate prognostic models were evaluated: Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, single-tree recursive partitioning, random survival forest, conditional random forest. Median overall survival from progression was 7.6 months (mean, 10.1; range, 0-86) and 8.0 months (mean, 8.5; range, 0-56) in the training and validation sets, respectively (p = 0.900). Using the Cox model in the training set, independent predictors of poorer overall survival from progression included increasing age at histopathological diagnosis (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI [1.03-2.08]; p = 0.032), RTOG-RPA V-VI classes (aHR, 1.38; 95% CI [1.11-1.73]; p = 0.004), decreasing KPS at progression (aHR, 3.46; 95% CI [2.10-5.72]; p < 0.001), while independent predictors of longer overall survival from progression included surgical resection (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI [0.44-0.73]; p < 0.001) and chemotherapy (aHR, 0.41; 95% CI [0.31-0.55]; p < 0.001). Single-tree recursive partitioning identified KPS at progression, surgical resection at progression, chemotherapy at progression, and RTOG-RPA class at histopathological diagnosis, as main survival predictors in the training set, yielding four risk categories highly predictive of overall survival from progression both in training (p < 0.0001) and validation (p < 0.0001) sets. Both random forest approaches identified KPS at progression as the most important survival predictor. Age, KPS at progression, RTOG-RPA classes, surgical resection at progression and chemotherapy at progression are prognostic for survival in recurrent glioblastomas and should inform the treatment decisions.

Mots clés

Conditional random forest, Cox model, Decision tree, Glioblastoma, Karnofsky performance status, Overall survival, Prognostic models, Random survival forest, Recurrence, Recursive partitioning analysis, Surgery

Référence

J. Neurooncol.. 2018 Feb;136(3):565-576