Diabetic dyslipidaemia: insights for optimizing patient management.

Fiche publication


Date publication

janvier 2005

Auteurs

Membres identifiés du Cancéropôle Est :
Pr VERGES Bruno


Tous les auteurs :
Verges B

Résumé

Background: Lipid abnormalities in people with diabetes are likely to play an important role in the development of atherogenesis. These lipid disorders include potentially atherogenic quantitative (increased triglyceride levels and decreased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C] levels) and qualitative abnormalities of lipoproteins (changes in lipoprotein size, increase in triglyceride content of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and HDL, glycation of apoproteins and increased susceptibility of LDL to oxidation). Guidelines from the two main diabetes organizations, the International Diabetes Federation and the American Diabetes Association, recommend the aggressive management of diabetic dyslipidaemia to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statins are the first choice pharmacological therapy to address diabetic dyslipidaemia due to their effectiveness at lowering LDL-C levels in patients with diabetes. Fibrates (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [PPAR]alpha ligands) target another aspect of dyslipidaemia by lowering triglycerides (to a greater extent than statins) and raising HDL-C levels, especially when baseline levels are low. The PPAR gamma agonist, pioglitazone appears to affect lipid metabolism by decreasing plasma triglycerides, increasing HDL-C and decreasing the number of small, dense atherogenic LDL particles. Scope: This paper provides a review of the current literature (based on searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1985 to 2005, inclusive) supporting the recommendations for the management of dyslipidaemia among patients with type 2 diabetes, including new strategies involving drug combinations that achieve good glycaemic and lipidaemic control that could potentially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with type 2 diabetes.

Référence

Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21 Suppl 1:S29-40.